Predator Drones

In the New York Times of December 4th, there is a long report on the use of predator drones to track down and slay members of the Taliban an al Qaeda. The use of such weaponry was very disturbing to Tom Parker, policy director for counterterrorism at Amnesty International. He is reported as saying, “Anything that dehumanizes the process makes it easier to pull the trigger.” It is not clear precisely what disturbs Mr. Parker. Killing in any form has been a common human activity since Cain became annoyed with Abel.


Mr. Parker implies that anything that emotionally detaches the shooter from the shootee is objectionably dehumanizing. High-level aerial bombardment or cannonade by long-range artillery would fit his criteria for emotional detachment. Low level strafing of troops, a sniper blowing a man’s head to pieces, or a suicide bomber on a bus full of people, is the proper way to kill.

Sometime, somewhere, someone must have observed that mankind’s supreme stupidity is the practice of war. The Geneva Convention attempts to delimit both the extent of the stupidity and (if this may be forgiven) its inhumanness.



What doesn’t Mr. Parker understand about waging war? Von Clausewitz stated it succinctly, “War is the continuation of policy by other means.” History tells us that ‘other means’ entails killing. It is not a chess game in which one acknowledges defeat by resigning. The entire point in pulling the trigger of a rifle, the lanyard of a fieldpiece, or pressing a bomb release is to kill someone. The ultimate governing principle is the (apocryphal) address by General Patton to his troops, “It is not your duty to die for your country; it is your duty to make the enemy die for his.”